Legal Opinion

Hagaman v. Frederick

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 12, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant Hagaman sold a tract of forty-five lots and took the mortgage under foreclosure in part payment. He assigned a half interest to his co-complainant. The mortgage, for $14,000, bears date February 7th, 1927, payable February 7th, 1933, with interest; it is silent as to the usual six months installment payment period and as to the rate of interest although it contains a futile thirty-day default clause. It contains this covenant:

"The party of the second part hereby agrees and this mortgage is given with the understanding that any one of the above-mentioned lots excepting the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ventnor Investment & Realty Co. v. Record Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
  2. Dimeo v. EllensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Meyer v. ReedNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  4. Hall v. Home Building Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Park Invest. v. Vanderzee Bros. Bldg.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  2. Romano v. Washington Tp. Assocs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  3. Harris County Houston Ship Channel Nav. Dist. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Simonson v. Z Cranbury AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API