Legal Opinion

State v. Pigg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1908No. 15,652PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court; Alston W. Dana, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The information in this case charged the defendant with a number of unlawful sales of intoxicating liquor, and also with keeping and maintaining a common nuisance under the prohibitory law. The jury returned a verdict finding defendant guilty of three sales, as charged in the eighth, ninth and tenth counts of the information, and of maintaining a nuisance, as charged in the eighteenth count, and not guilty on the other counts.

There is nothing substantial in the claim of error in the admission of testimony. In prosecutions of this kind…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Intoxicating-Liquor CasesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. State v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. State v. NippertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. State v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. State v. ShookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State of Kansas v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Doscher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. LegendreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  4. State v. Miclau, Jr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. City of Topeka v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API