Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Clark v. Baines

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 18, 2002No. 25879-0-IIPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMorgan, J.

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) — The majority’s statement of facts is incomplete. To fully understand the case, it is necessary to consider the following facts also.

On Thursday, October 2, 1997, Piety Ann Clark told a Pierce County deputy sheriff “that she ha[d] been raped, approximately eight times by Wayne Baines.” She also said that Baines had “threatened her with a handgun.” Baines told the deputy “the sexual acts were consensual.”12

On October 6, 1997, the State charged Baines with first degree rape in Pierce County cause number 97-1-04097-5. He was arraigned and pleaded not…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API