In the Interest of T. T.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
T. T. was adjudicated delinquent after the juvenile court found he had committed an act which, had he been an adult, would have supported a conviction for burglary.1 He appeals, contending in his sole enumeration of error that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction for burglary. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
In considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting an adjudication of delinquency, we construe the evidence and every inference from the evidence in favor of the juvenile court’s adjudication to determine if a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wisdom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- In the Interest of T. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of B. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- In the Interest of C. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Boggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- In the Interest of J. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- In the Interest of R. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.