Deich v. American Discount Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
A traverse of an entry of service must allege that it is filed at the first term alter notice to the defendant (Code § 81-214), and must deny the truth of the entry of service. Parker v. Rosenheim, 97 Ga. 769, 771 (25 SE 763); Sanford v. Bates, 99 Ga. 145 (1) (25 SE 35); City of Albany v. Parks, 61 Ga. App. 55 (2) (5 SE2d 680); Caye & Co. v. Davidson, 94 Ga. App. 574 (1) (95 SE2d 746). While an amendment of a proper traverse may be made to make the sheriff a party (see Stone v. Richardson, 76 Ga. 97) "in order for a timely traverse, however made, to stand as such and furnish…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanford v. BatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Webb v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Parker v. Rosenheim & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Stone v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- City of Albany v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deich v. American Discount Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963