Legal Opinion
Raymond, Colesar, Glaspy & Huss, P.C. v. Allied Capital Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided March 20, 1991No. Civ. A. 3:90CV00625PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SPENCER, District Judge.
Defendant Allied Capital Corporation (“Allied”) has moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). For the reasons stated in this memorandum, the motion is DENIED.
I
The following describes the factual allegations of the complaint as if true.
Raymond, Colesar, Glaspy & Huss, P.C. (“Raymond, Colesar” or “RCGH”) is a Virginia corporation based in Richmond. Allied is a Washington, D.C. corporation with its principal place of business there. Allied is a venture capital company which has arranged or provided financing for many…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Verizon Online Services, Inc. v. RalskyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
- D'ADDARIO v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Bay Tobacco, LLC v. Bell Quality Tobacco Products, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Production Group International, Inc. v. GoldmanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Holland v. HayDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.