Legal Opinion
United States v. Earl K. H. Kim, Harry I. A. Ah Nee, Chester Hanawahine, Penrod S. Fanene, Catalino Gedarro, and Ralph H. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 11, 1970No. 24059_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were charged with the offense of violating 26 U.S.C. § 5851, of the National Firearms Act, in that they:
“knowingly did possess a firearm described in 26 United States Code, Section 5848(1), to wit, a U.S. carbine, .30 caliber, Ml, Serial No. 3744036, having a barrel length of 11% inches and an overall length of 22% inches which had been made in violation of the provisions of Section 5821(e) of Title 26, United States Code, in violation of Section 5851 of Title 26, United States Code.”
Following conviction by a jury, imposition of sentences by the court, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- DuPont v. Crummer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Gilberto SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- State v. WyattHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Larry Gene WickizerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Robert Lee BookerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- State v. KapoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.