Legal Opinion

Folk v. Beidelman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Columbia county. Ejectment by Valentine Beidelman against John Folk, for ten . acres of land covered with water, including part of a dam and water power. For the facts of the case, see the former report in 5 Watts, p. 308.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Sergeant, J.

This was an ejectment for ten acres of land covered with water: and the ground in controversy consisted of a small portion on the east side of Fishing creek. The plaintiff’s tract of land lies on the eastern side of the creek, and the defendant’s on the western side. The defendant has a mill, and the water of the creek is turned to it by a dam thrown across the creek from his land, to the eastern portion of ground, which, with the eastern abutment of the dam, the plaintiff alleges is his ground. The dam was originally erected in the year…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beidelman v. FoulkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peters v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1846

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API