Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 2015No. 13-9026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

Federal law establishes enhanced penalties for anyone who "forces any person to accompany him" in the course of committing or fleeing from a bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (e). We consider whether this provision applies when a bank robber forces someone to move with him over a short distance.

I

Petitioner Larry Whitfield, fleeing police after a botched bank robbery, entered the home of 79-year-old Mary Parnell through an unlocked door. Once inside, he encountered a terrified Parnell and guided her from the hallway to a computer room (which Whitfield estimates was between four and nine feet…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. Larry WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. Davis v. PotterIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. Oracio Corrales-VazquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API