United States v. Giraudo
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CLARIFYING ORDER
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
While investigating Defendants, federal agents decided to bug a courthouse. They also decided that they didn’t need a warrant to, yes, bug a courthouse. There can be no doubt that these decisions flouted constitutional and statutory protections alike. But in this criminal case, questions remain about who may suppress what as a result.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Legal Backdrop
Two legal regimes are in play here: one constitutional, one statutory.
1. Fourth Amendment
The government conducts a search under the Fourth Amendment when an effort to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Leron LigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026