Legal Opinion

United States v. Giraudo

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 21, 2016No. CR 14-534 CRBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARIFYING ORDER

CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

While investigating Defendants, federal agents decided to bug a courthouse. They also decided that they didn’t need a warrant to, yes, bug a courthouse. There can be no doubt that these decisions flouted constitutional and statutory protections alike. But in this criminal case, questions remain about who may suppress what as a result.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Legal Backdrop

Two legal regimes are in play here: one constitutional, one statutory.

1. Fourth Amendment

The government conducts a search under the Fourth Amendment when an effort to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Leron LigginsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API