Legal Opinion

Smith v. Kochersperger

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This cause was before this court at the April term, 1898,. and the decree dismissing the bill was reversed and the cause remanded because interests of the city of Chicago were involved and it had not been made a party to the bill. (Smith v. Kochersperger, 173 Ill. 201.) The substance of the bill will be found in the opinion then rendered. After the cause was re-instated in the superior court and the city made a party, the complainants filed an amended bill, containing the substance of the original bill and some additional matter which need not be stated, as it contains nothing which would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callister v. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sumner v. Village of MilfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API