Firo v. State

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

YÁÑEZ, Justice.

We write in response to the State’s petition for discretionary review to clarify the language in this court’s original opinion 878 S.W.2d 254. We sustained the appellant’s complaints on the improper admission of a psychiatric report. The State cited our opin*535ion in Zuniga v. State, 685 S.W.2d 780, 783 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1982, pet. ref'd) and argued that error, if any, was harmless because the record failed to affirmatively disclose that the jury ever requested the psychiatric report or saw the report. Our decision in the ease at bar does not conflict…