Legal Opinion

Bryan-Wollman v. Domonko

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2007No. 2006-1201PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} On September 30, 1999, a car driven by appellee Kathleen BryanWollman was struck by a car driven by appellant Corrine Domonko. Domonko admitted her negligence. After a trial, the jury returned a verdict for the defense, apparently finding that there were no damages proximately caused by the collision. Bryan-Wollman moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial; the motion was denied. Bryan-Wollman appealed, and the court of appeals reversed, concluding, “The trial court should have granted plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LitrealOhio Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Carbone v. Nueva Constr. Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Mehta v. Ohio UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API