Legal Opinion

Mills v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1954No. 34891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

The first special ground of the motion for new trial shows that the defendant admitted a prima facie case and then assumed the burden of proof; and error is assigned on the court’s allowing the defendant to have the opening and conclusion of the argument before the jury. It does not appear that the plaintiff made any objection or asked for any ruling of the court when the defendant undertook to assume the burden of proof, and the plaintiff thereby waived the right to open and conclude the argument. Zachry v. Stewart, 67 Ga. 218 (1); Dwelle v. Blackwood, 106 Ga. 486 (2) (32 S. E. 593); Willing-*504…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willingham v. Macon & Birmingham Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Dwelle & Daniel v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Fletcher v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Zachry v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henry & Hutchinson v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API