Interstate Commerce Commission v. All American Ass'n
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, District Judge.
1. This action was brought by the Interstate Commerce Commission, plaintiff, under 49 U.S.Code 322(b) to enjoin All American Association, referred to as “AAA” and two of its officials, Raymond Waters and Gerald Ragle, defendants, from engaging in the for-hire transportation of property by motor vehicle, in violation of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, codified as 49 U.S.Code 301 et seq.
Defendants contend the operations of AAA are exempt under the agricultural cooperative exemption, 49 U.S.Code 303 (b) (5). This…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northwest Agricultural Cooperative Association, Inc., a Corporation v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Agricultural Transp. Ass'n of Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bray Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1973
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Milk Producers Marketing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Carter Reservoir Mustangs, Inc. et al. v. United States Department of Interior et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Milk Producers Marketing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969