Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical College

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 2011No. 2010 CA 1049Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHigginbotham, J.

|,I partially disagree with the majority, because I conclude that Dr. Slaughter’s “wages” were clearly defined in the two-year employment contract entered into between Dr. Slaughter and the Southern University Board. The provision regarding Dr. Slaughter’s services to be rendered as President of the Southern University System unambiguously defined “earned compensation” to be a base salary of $220,000 per year, a vehicle allowance of $1,000 per month, a housing allowance of $3,000 per month, and a salary supplement of $200,000 per year to be provided by the Southern University System…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Board of Supervisors of Southern University & Agricultural & Mechanical CollegeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Cochran v. American Advantage Mortg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Williams v. Dolgencorp, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Ex Parte Ward, 1090132 (Ala. 6-3-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Thomas v. ORLEANS PRIV. INDUSTRY COUNCIL, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API