Legal Opinion

Whaley v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1918PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sullivan County. —Hon. Hal H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greek

delivered, the opinion of the Court.

The Bristol China Company is a Tennessee corporation, whose affairs are being wound up in the bankruptcy court at Bristol. The complainant, Irving Whaley, is its trustee in bankruptcy.

E. W. King subscribed to fifty shares of the capital stock of this corporation, of the par value of $5,000. Some time later he entered into a transaction with the corporation whereby the latter undertook to purchase from him these shares of its own stock. This suit is brought by the trustee to recover from King the amount of money paid to him on account of this attempted…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Western Tie & Timber Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Nashville Trust Co. v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Shields v. Clifton Hill Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Chemical Corp. v. Producers Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Bean v. Commercial Securities Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  3. Baird v. McDaniel Printing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  4. Uffelman v. BoillinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Greene v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API