Legal Opinion

Woodward v. City Council of Augusta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1968No. 43659PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

“A witness may refresh and assist his memory by the use of any written instrument or memorandum, provided he finally shall speak from his recollection thus refreshed, or shall be willing to swear positively from the paper.” Code § 38-1707. This definitely allows oral testimony by a witness which the witness, absent the memorandum, would not be able otherwise to recollect. Does it also form a basis for allowing the written memorandum on which the oral testimony is based to be introduced in evidence? Excluding such memoranda as are admissible by reason of coming under the Business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Mallette v. MalletteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Draffin v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lester v. S. J. Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Department of Transportation v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. RheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Mabry v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Atlanta Recycled Fiber Co. v. Tri-Cities Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API