Legal Opinion

Metro Burak, Inc. v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover moneys belonging to plaintiff’s judgment debtor, which were being held by defendant as the debtor’s factor, the interpleaded defendant appeals from so much *1004In of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated July 11, 1975, as, upon plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, (1) failed to grant summary judgment to it and (2) made provisions (the sixth and seventh decretal paragraphs) pursuant to CPLR 3212 (subd [g]). Order modified by deleting therefrom the sixth and seventh decretal paragraphs and substituting therefor the following: "ordered, that pursuant to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metro Burak, Inc. v. Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mintz v. Joseph Clavin & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Princeton Bank & Trust Co. v. BerleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. In Re Kam Kuo Seafood Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. D'Elia v. Douglas B.New York City Family Court · 1988
  4. Alterman v. Chronetics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API