Legal Opinion

State Board of Medical Examiners v. Citarella

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 2, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

Respondent, defendant below, was charged by the prosecutor, plaintiff below, with having violated section 10 of an act of the legislature of our state, entitled "An act to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery, to license physicians and surgeons and to punish persons violating the provisions thereof,” approved May 22d, 1894, amended April 8th, 192.1, in that she (defendant) did commence and continue to practice medicine and surgery during the months of August, September and October, 1929, within the meaning of section 8 of the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. De YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  3. State Board of Medical Examiners v. De YoungSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. State Board of Medical Examiners v. DussingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API