Legal Opinion
State v. Huber, 07-Ca-88 (4-3-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2009No. 07-CA-88PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} On March 7, 2006, Joseph W. Huber (Appellant) was caught with a suitcase chock-full of thousands of narcotic pain-reliever and analgesic tablets-methadone, hydrocodone, oxycodone, fentanyl patches, and acetaminophen with codeine. He was convicted on five counts of controlled substance possession in back-to-back trials (Huber I, No. 06-CR-509, and Huber II, No. 06-CR-674). The prosecutor's misidentification of the fentanyl patches in the original indictment required the state to reindict Mr. Huber, prompting the second trial three months later. The two trials spawned two appeals…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. GarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HawesOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HuberOhio Court of Appeals · 2012