Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Azarch

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 11, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Clay

Affirming.

The appeal is from a judgment based on a directed verdict finding appellant guilty of forcible detainer.

It is insisted that appellant and not appellee was entitled to a peremptory instruction.

The facts are: Appellee, Louis Azarch, owns a house and lot in Pike county at the end of the bridge spanning Tng river. On February 18, 1932, Azarch entered into a written contract whereby he leased the premises at a rental of $25 a month to Fred and Harold Varney for a period of 12 months from March 1, 1932, with the privilege of renewing the lease at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gibralter Coal Mining Company v. CothranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Duff v. P. T. Allen Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  3. Warren v. Cary-Glendon Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
  4. Miller v. TuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API