Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided July 31, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 85-3453PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

LITTLE, District Judge.

The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. In spite of the absence of substantive analysis or citation from the defendant, the law and reason *1551applied to the undisputed facts leaves no doubt that the plaintiff should not recover.

The parties agree that the plaintiff was the recipient of a handsome award for personal injuries sustained at the hands of the wrongdoer, Valley Electric Membership Corp. The judgment, in excess of one million dollars, was cast in favor of the plaintiff and against Valley and its liability insurer, Nationwide Mutual Insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. BrumfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Fidelity Mut. Ins.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954
  4. Ubas v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Nationwide Mut. InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Skinner v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API