Rousseau v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
This is an action to recover the additional death benefits provided in two life insurance policies when death results “solely through external, violent and accidental means.”
Findings of the trial judge establish that the insured and two other young men, after an evening of drinking together, stole an automobile; that the insured drove it to his own home, where he stopped to get some money; that thereafter another of the young men drove the party westerly from Gardner as fast as the automobile would go. The insured fell into a drunken stupor. About five miles east of Greenfield police officers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Der Minasian v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- DeMello v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Smith v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Bowman v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Hawkeye Security Insurance v. ShieldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Lubianez v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.