Legal Opinion
Wilson, Banking Com'r v. Louisville Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided February 16, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Bichardson —
Affirming.
This appeal presents for interpretation and the application of sections 165a-l to 165a-22, Ky. Statutes, inclusive,-to the facts appearing herein, in respect to the authority, power and duty of the hanking commissioner when a bank organized under the laws of this state posts on its front door a notice signed by a majority of the directors in their own handwriting', stating, “This.bank is in the hands of the banking commissioner” and forthwith notifies him of such act.
A bank within the meaning of the statutes includes all banks, trust…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dorman, Banking Com'r v. DellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Community Credit Union, Inc. v. ConnorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Security Trust Company v. DabneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Young, Etc. v. Bankers' Trust Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Collopy v. Dorman, Bk. and SEC. Commr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.