Raines v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Per curiam
1. As a matter of law the evidence does not demand the conclusion that the prosecutor was the aggressor. The jury were authorized to find that the defendant by his words and. conduct provoked the difficulty and provoked the prosecutor to use the opprobrious words attributed' to him. The jury were further authorized to find that the accused was not justified, since he provoked the difficulty, if the jury so found, to retort “You are another one.” The jury were further authorized to find, under such a situation, that the defendant was not justified in either striking the prosecutor with a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fish v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Meaders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Talmadge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007