Legal Opinion

United States v. Robbins

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. ACM 23802PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

The accused, Senior Airman Robbins, argues that he was denied a proper hearing on sentence when the military judge refused to either: (a) compel the prosecution to introduce the accused’s airman performance reports; or (b) make them court exhibits.

We disagree and find United States v. Smith, 16 M.J. 694 (A.F.C.M.R.1983) dispositive of this issue; see also United States v. Morgan, 15 M.J. 128 (C.M.A.1983). Accordingly, we affirm.

This is another case where the accused’s performance reports have been effectively embargoed from the trial court. In Smith, we first…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. MorganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodwinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. MannUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API