Legal Opinion

Balcom v. Royal Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 6PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The defendants on appeal ask this court to assume the truth of certain allegations in the complaint; however, an examination of their answer shows that they deny the truth of those same allegations.

In the introduction to their argument they ask the court to make the following assumptions: (1) That the defendant, State Sand & Gravel Company, was the owner of the truck involved in the accident; (2) that State Sand & Gravel’s employee Hensiak was the driver of the truck and that the plaintiff, Robert Balcom, and his friend were within the range of Hensiak’s vision while they were standing at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dottai v. AltenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bank of Commerce v. PAINE, WEBBER, J. & C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Fuller v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Spoehr v. MittelstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Schandelmeier v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ceplina v. South Milwaukee School BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Marshall v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Capt. Soma Boat Line, Inc. v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Matthew v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API