Legal Opinion

Wimberly v. Buford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1983No. 56042PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

Jurisdiction assumed; let certiorari issue to the Court of Appeals, Temporary Division 113.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals Temporary Division 113 is hereby vacated, for a Court of Appeals may not overrule an opinion of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. Rule 3.13 A(4), 12 O.S.1981, Chap. 15, App. 3.

This Court is further of the opinion that Sudheimer v. Cheatam, 443 P.2d 951 (Okl.1968) is distinguishable in fact from and therefore not in conflict with Leach v. West, 504 P.2d 1233, 1237 (Okl.1972), and should not be overruled.

Leach v. West, supra, is dispositive.

CERTIORARI…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leach v. WestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  2. Sudheimer v. CheathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. LCR, INC. v. Linwood PropertiesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Collins v. Mid-Continent Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. BAYS EXPLORATION, INC. v. JonesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Matter of Adoption of KdkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  5. REEVES v. CITY OF DURANTCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API