Legal Opinion
Corey v. City of Dallas
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided November 29, 1972No. Civ. A. CA-3-5519-DPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
Samuel Corey, plaintiff, challenges as unconstitutional Ordinance No. 13,752 of the City of Dallas, Texas. This ordinance is codified in the City Code of Dallas as Chapter 25A Massage Establishments and it provides for the licensing and regulation of massage establishments. 1 Corey particularly challenges Section 25A-15 of this ordinance which makes it unlawful for any person to administer a massage to any person of the opposite sex. 2 The matter in controversy exceeds the sum of $10,000 and jurisdiction is conferred upon this court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James O. Pollard, Etc. v. Lila Cockrell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Magalene Harper, D/B/A Nugents Health Clinic, Anchor Baths, Inc. v. Jon LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Babin v. City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- MRM, INC. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Treants Enterprises, Inc. v. Onslow CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.