Legal Opinion

EVANS v. DOE 1

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 4, 2025No. 2:21-cv-00413Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEAH EVANS and SEMAJ CARTER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) 2:21cv413 ) Electronic Filing MICHAEL CATANZARO and ) LUCAS SZYMANSKI, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION Leah Evans and Semaj Carter (collectively "plaintiffs") commenced this civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

seeking redress for alleged violations of their Fourth Amendment rights. Two motions for summary judgment filed by Michael Catanzaro and Lucas Szymanski (collectively "defendants") are presently before the court. For the reasons set forth below, the motions will be granted. Federal Rule…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API