Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. Gunkel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 7, 1950No. 34439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in error have appealed from a judgment *409of the trial court in favor of plaintiffs below, defendants in error here, in forcible entry and detainer. The defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as frivolous. The plaintiffs in error have filed no response to the motion to dismiss, although requested to do so by the court, and have offered no excuse for such failure. In Gartrell v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan., 180 Okla. 523, 71 P. 2d 489, we said:

“Where a motion to dismiss is filed upon the ground that the appeal is without merit and for delay only, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gartrell v. Federal Land Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodruff v. GunkelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API