Legal Opinion

Williscroft v. Cargo of Cyrenian

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 11, 1903No. 151PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit in rem against cargo to recover demurrage.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in rem for demur-rage against 399,431 feet of lumber, the cargo of the barge Cyrenian. It is asserted by the libelant, owner of the'chartered vessel, that he was unreasonably delayed in loading the cargo at French River, Ontario, the port of shipment, and also in unloading at the dock of the consignee at Buffalo, N. Y., the port of discharge. No stipulation for delay or the number of days allowed for loading and unloading is contained in the bill of lading or contract of shipment. Under such circumstances, it is the law that the consignee is liable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riley v. A Cargo of Iron PipesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Milburn v. Federal Sugar Refining Co. of YonkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. Ottawa Transit Co. v. 261,000 Bushels of WheatDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1919
  3. Acme Transit Co. v. 133,000 Bushels of WheatDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1917
  4. In re 2,098 Tons of CoalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  5. Wasson v. StetsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API