Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Moss v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1998No. S057081Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

KENNARD, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the majority opinion except as to the disposition. The majority holds, and I agree, that a parent may not avoid criminal contempt sanctions for violating a child support order by asserting the defense of financial inability to comply with the order if that inability results from the parent’s unexcused failure to seek or accept suitable employment. (Maj. opn., ante, at p. 401.) But the majority declines to apply this holding to Brent Moss, the alleged contemner in this case, stating that the decision “may reasonably be seen as both an…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API