Legal Opinion

Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. Lazaroff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 23, 1942No. 15,068PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

Plaintiffs in error, as employer and insurance carrier respectively, here seek the reversal of a judgment of the district court affirming an award of the Industrial-Commission granting a surgical operation and workmen’s compensation for a hernia, to defendant in error, the employee claimant.

February 7, 1941, a piece of coal weighing about fifty pounds, which claimant had just placed on a mine car, started to fall or roll toward him. He shoved the right side of his body up against the descending coal and succeeded in holding it in the car. In so doing his left foot slipped, but he did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Industrial Commission v. W. A. Hover & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Industrial Commission v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n v. DureeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. FrihaufWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re HardisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Great American Indemnity Company v. GravellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Osceola Foods, Inc. v. AndrewCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API