Legal Opinion
Planning Technologies, Inc. v. Korman
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 17, 2008No. A07A2023PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bernes, Judge.
Defendants PlanningTechnologies, Inc. (“PTI”), Arturo H. Sanchez, and Ronald G. Spencer appeal the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Peter J. Korman on his claim for breach of a stock option agreement. For the reasons discussed below, we vacate the trial court’s order granting summary judgment and remand with instruction.
On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, we review the evidence de novo, viewing it in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, to determine whether the trial court erred in concluding that no genuine issue of material…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Donald R. Scribner v. Worldcom, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- MacDougald Construction Co. v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Hunting Aircraft, Inc. v. Peachtree City Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- ULQ, LLC v. MederCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Johnny Wilson v. Clark Atlanta University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Walker v. Oglethorpe Power Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Capital Health Management Group Inc. v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- RIGBY Et Al. v. BOATRIGHT Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.