Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Norris

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1954No. 1547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Norris sued Dawson for a real estate broker’s commission. The property had been listed for sale with Norris by Dawson, agent and husband of the owner. The listing was non-exclusive, and Dawson also listed the property with several other brokers. After the agreement had been signed, Norris went to the property to put up his realtor’s sign. As he was doing so, Williams, one of the owners of the business next door, walked over and spoke to him. Norris asked Williams if he was interested in buying the property. Williams replied that he was not. No further conversations or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rieffer v. HollingsworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Hecht Co. v. WhitefordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Webster v. PerperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Lady v. Realty Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Clark v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bergman v. GITELSON & NEFF ASSOCIATES, INC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Branch v. BranchDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API