Legal Opinion

People v. Nuruzzaman

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 13, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard M. Weinberg, J.

Defendant is charged in an information with forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52), sexual abuse in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.55) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]). He moves for an order dismissing the forcible touching count for facial insufficiency under Criminal Procedure Law § 100.40, as well as other forms of relief.

Criminal Procedure Law § 100.40 and, by reference, Criminal Procedure Law § 100.15 require that factual allegations of an *357evidentiary character in the information provide reasonable cause to believe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HouseIthaca City Court · 2014
  2. People v. PowellCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
  3. People v. TaylorNassau County District Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API