People v. Nuruzzaman
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Richard M. Weinberg, J.
Defendant is charged in an information with forcible touching (Penal Law § 130.52), sexual abuse in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.55) and harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]). He moves for an order dismissing the forcible touching count for facial insufficiency under Criminal Procedure Law § 100.40, as well as other forms of relief.
Criminal Procedure Law § 100.40 and, by reference, Criminal Procedure Law § 100.15 require that factual allegations of an *357evidentiary character in the information provide reasonable cause to believe…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. HouseIthaca City Court · 2014
- People v. PowellCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2008
- People v. TaylorNassau County District Court · 2009