Legal Opinion
McFarlan v. Manget
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided April 11, 1934No. 10101PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Where a demurrer to a petition was filed after the expiration of the time allowed by law, but the ease had not been marked in default, it was not error to refuse to strike the demurrer because not filed in time. Glass v. Allen, 141 Ga. 30 (80 S. E. 284); Chero-Cola Co. v. Southern Express Co., 150 Ga. 430 (104 S. E. 233); Hill v. Cox, 151 Ga. 599 (107 S. E. 850).
2. An injunction will not be granted to restrain a slander or libel, when there is no infringement of a property right. If .there is any exception to this rule, the present case falls within the rule, and not the excep tion. Singer…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marlin Fire Arms Co. v. . ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Hill v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Schoen v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Beck v. OdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Jackson v. Douglas County Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Austell Bank v. National Bondholders Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Ray v. Henco Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980