Legal Opinion

Van Dyke v. Van Dyke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1923No. 14290PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “Assignments of error upon the admission of evidence, in order to avail the plaintiff in error here, must show, not only in what respects the evidence admitted was objectionable, but that this objection was urged at the time of the admission of the evidence.” Henslee v. Harper, 148 Ga. 621 (1) (97 S. E. 667). Under this ruling, none of the assignments in the petition for certiorari upon the admission of evidence can be considered.

2. “In the absence of an appropriate request it is not error for the trial judge to omit specific reference to particular points or phases of the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Tarver v. DeppenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Cooper v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Riddle v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Brown v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Gainesville Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Pratt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API