Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Sterling Amherst Farms Dairy, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1943Published

1Dissent

Dowling, J. (dissenting).

I think the beverage was adulterated and misbranded within the meaning of section 200, subdivision 10 and section 201, subdivision 11. The jury could have found that the beverage was misbranded because the label failed to disclose to the purchaser that the coloring was artificial and they could have found that the beverage was adulterated because the coloring used was designed to make the purchaser believe that the orange content was greater than it really was and that the beverage was better than it really was. The trial court had no right to limit the issue to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . GirardNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. People v. . LuhrsNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. People v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API