Legal Opinion

Culligan v. Wootton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1952No. 12470PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Harry L. Culligan and his mother, Mrs. Frances Culligan, plaintiffs below, appealed from the judgment, asserting that they were entitled to recover damages in a larger amount than that awarded in the trial court. Said parties filed the transcript in this Court and will be referred to as appellants. The defendant below, E. B. Wootton, will be referred to as appellee, although he has filed cross-points asserting that the judgment should be reversed.

This is an action for damages growing out of the sale of lands located in Dimmit County, Texas. The jury in answer to special…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. PepperTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bowman v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Rodriguez v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Rodriguez v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bowman v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Whisenhunt v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API