Legal Opinion

Heuss v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 25, 2007No. 06-875 CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs complaint arises from his separation from the United States Navy on January 2, 1986. Defendant filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction because plaintiffs complaint is barred by the six year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (defendant’s Motion or Def.’s Mot.) 1. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS defendant’s Motion.

I. Background

Plaintiff enlisted in the United States Navy on February 2, 1984.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API