Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Judge.
Mary Cocchiarella claims that Donald Driggs agreed to rent an apartment to her but later prevented her from moving into the apartment and refused to return her payment of the security deposit and the first month’s rent.' Cocchiarella commenced this action to obtain possession of the apartment and to recover damages. The district court dismissed Cocchiarella’s claim, for possession of the apartment on the ground that she cannot satisfy the requirements of the statute on which her claim is based because she never occupied the apartment. We conclude that the district court…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Gassler v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald DriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016