Legal Opinion
United States v. Martez Dickson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 27, 2017No. 16-1039PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Martez Dickson appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a gun. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence and by imposing vague conditions of supervised release. We find no error in the court’s evidentiary ruling but agree with Dickson that two of his conditions of supervision are problematic. Consequently, we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand for a limited resentenc-ing hearing.
In May 2014, three police officers in Rockford, Illinois, responded to a report that two individuals were asleep in a parked car…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shaun J. Matz v. Rodney KlotkaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Smith v. Ball State Univ.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Michael AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Darick HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. FeterickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Cordell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Cordell CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Darick HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.