Legal Opinion

Turner v. Malone

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Cothran, J., Spartanburg, March, 1885. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This was an action for the recovery of a tract of land, 347 acres. Both parties claimed under one Edmond Cooley, jr., who lived on the land until his death intestate, about ten years ago. He left as his heirs and distributees a widow, Emeline, and five children, viz., John S. B. Cooley, Caroline Kimbrell, Teresa Oliver, Martha Jane Kimbrell, and Jefferson D. Cooley. The plaintiff claimed that the ancestor, Edmond Cooley, about 1864, made a deed of gift of the land to his wife, Emeline, which was not at the time probated or recorded;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The Union Bank of Tennessee v. Jolly's Adm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Simms v. SlacumSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BowersDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1954
  2. Innovative Waste Mgmt. Inc. v. Crest Energy Partners GP, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  3. In Re: WillcoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Ross v. Medical UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API