Legal Opinion

Glover v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1926No. 17526Published

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

The accused was charged with vagrancy and was convicted; and he excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The State introduced certain testimony relative to the defendant’s transporting whisky and indulging in other immoral conduct. While this evidence was admissible and had 'probative value in showing whether or not the defendant. was earning an honest livelihood, it is not sufficient within itself to prove the defendant guilty of the offense charged in the indictment. As stated in Hartman v. State, 119 Ga. 429 (46 S. E. 628), these offenses “are made penal by other statutes…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Welborn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Elders v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Hawks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API