Legal Opinion · Dissent

Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. New Britain Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1979No. Appeal, No. 507 C.D. 1978Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Mencer:

I respectfully dissent. I hold to the view that an 18,700-square-foot lot area requirement for mobile home park usage is an unreasonable regulation. My reasons for such a view are fully set forth in my dissenting opinions filed in Delaware County Investment Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Township of Middletown, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 12, 347 A.2d 513 (1975), and in Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, 5 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 594, 290 A.2d 719 (1972).1

Judge Craig joins in this dissent.

Although these two eases were factually…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Delaware County Investment Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API