Legal Opinion
MATTER OF MARKS v. Marks
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In each proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Burke, Scileppi and Keating. Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Bergan dissent and vote to modify by directing that the sentence to jail be held in abeyance pending the psychiatric examination directed by the Family Court, and reconsidered in the light of what such examination may disclose.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Bernal v. BernalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Guardianship & Custody of SloanNew York City Family Court · 1975