Legal Opinion · Dissent

McElmurray v. Augusta-Richmond County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 2005No. A05A0262Published

1DissentAndrews, Presiding Judge

Because the damages claimed in this case did not occur as a result of the county’s negligent use of a motor vehicle, they are not covered by the liability insurance purchased by the county. Therefore, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the State has waived sovereign immunity and I respectfully dissent.

A county enjoys the same constitutional sovereign immunity as the State. Waiver of a State’s sovereign immunity, like waiver of any constitutional right, is strictly construed in favor of the holder of the right. Pennhurst State School &c. v. Halderman, 465 U. S. 89, 99 (104 SC 900,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harry v. Glynn CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Crider v. Zurich InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Saylor v. Troup CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Mitchell v. City of St. MarysCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API